Fact checking Save Idaho Horse Racing’s second campaign ad
Articles Blog

Fact checking Save Idaho Horse Racing’s second campaign ad

August 21, 2019


CONTINUING CONTINUING OUR CONTINUING OUR AD- CONTINUING OUR AD-
WATCH CONTINUING OUR AD-
WATCH SERIES CONTINUING OUR AD-
WATCH SERIES — CONTINUING OUR AD-
WATCH SERIES — SAVE CONTINUING OUR AD-
WATCH SERIES — SAVE
IDAHO CONTINUING OUR AD-
WATCH SERIES — SAVE
IDAHO HORSE CONTINUING OUR AD-
WATCH SERIES — SAVE
IDAHO HORSE RACING CONTINUING OUR AD-
WATCH SERIES — SAVE
IDAHO HORSE RACING IS WATCH SERIES — SAVE
IDAHO HORSE RACING IS WATCH SERIES — SAVE
IDAHO HORSE RACING IS
NOW WATCH SERIES — SAVE
IDAHO HORSE RACING IS
NOW RUNNING WATCH SERIES — SAVE
IDAHO HORSE RACING IS
NOW RUNNING A WATCH SERIES — SAVE
IDAHO HORSE RACING IS
NOW RUNNING A NEW WATCH SERIES — SAVE
IDAHO HORSE RACING IS
NOW RUNNING A NEW AD IDAHO HORSE RACING IS
NOW RUNNING A NEW AD IDAHO HORSE RACING IS
NOW RUNNING A NEW AD
IN IDAHO HORSE RACING IS
NOW RUNNING A NEW AD
IN RESPONSE IDAHO HORSE RACING IS
NOW RUNNING A NEW AD
IN RESPONSE TO IDAHO HORSE RACING IS
NOW RUNNING A NEW AD
IN RESPONSE TO A NOW RUNNING A NEW AD
IN RESPONSE TO A NOW RUNNING A NEW AD
IN RESPONSE TO A
POLITICAL NOW RUNNING A NEW AD
IN RESPONSE TO A
POLITICAL ATTACK NOW RUNNING A NEW AD
IN RESPONSE TO A
POLITICAL ATTACK AD IN RESPONSE TO A
POLITICAL ATTACK AD IN RESPONSE TO A
POLITICAL ATTACK AD
TARGETING IN RESPONSE TO A
POLITICAL ATTACK AD
TARGETING THEIR POLITICAL ATTACK AD
TARGETING THEIR POLITICAL ATTACK AD
TARGETING THEIR
ORIGINAL POLITICAL ATTACK AD
TARGETING THEIR
ORIGINAL CAMPAIGN POLITICAL ATTACK AD
TARGETING THEIR
ORIGINAL CAMPAIGN AD. TARGETING THEIR
ORIGINAL CAMPAIGN AD. TARGETING THEIR
ORIGINAL CAMPAIGN AD.
OUR TARGETING THEIR
ORIGINAL CAMPAIGN AD.
OUR JOE TARGETING THEIR
ORIGINAL CAMPAIGN AD.
OUR JOE PARRIS TARGETING THEIR
ORIGINAL CAMPAIGN AD.
OUR JOE PARRIS GOES ORIGINAL CAMPAIGN AD.
OUR JOE PARRIS GOES ORIGINAL CAMPAIGN AD.
OUR JOE PARRIS GOES
CLAIM ORIGINAL CAMPAIGN AD.
OUR JOE PARRIS GOES
CLAIM BY ORIGINAL CAMPAIGN AD.
OUR JOE PARRIS GOES
CLAIM BY CLAIM ORIGINAL CAMPAIGN AD.
OUR JOE PARRIS GOES
CLAIM BY CLAIM AND OUR JOE PARRIS GOES
CLAIM BY CLAIM AND OUR JOE PARRIS GOES
CLAIM BY CLAIM AND
VERIFIES OUR JOE PARRIS GOES
CLAIM BY CLAIM AND
VERIFIES WHAT’S OUR JOE PARRIS GOES
CLAIM BY CLAIM AND
VERIFIES WHAT’S TRUE. CLAIM BY CLAIM AND
VERIFIES WHAT’S TRUE. VERIFIES WHAT’S TRUE. JOE JOE
IN JOE
IN THIS JOE
IN THIS NEW JOE
IN THIS NEW AD, JOE
IN THIS NEW AD, SAVE JOE
IN THIS NEW AD, SAVE
IDAHO JOE
IN THIS NEW AD, SAVE
IDAHO HORSE JOE
IN THIS NEW AD, SAVE
IDAHO HORSE RACING IN THIS NEW AD, SAVE
IDAHO HORSE RACING IN THIS NEW AD, SAVE
IDAHO HORSE RACING
DEFENDS IN THIS NEW AD, SAVE
IDAHO HORSE RACING
DEFENDS THEIR IDAHO HORSE RACING
DEFENDS THEIR IDAHO HORSE RACING
DEFENDS THEIR
CAMPAIGN IDAHO HORSE RACING
DEFENDS THEIR
CAMPAIGN CLAIMS IDAHO HORSE RACING
DEFENDS THEIR
CAMPAIGN CLAIMS AND DEFENDS THEIR
CAMPAIGN CLAIMS AND DEFENDS THEIR
CAMPAIGN CLAIMS AND
RAISES DEFENDS THEIR
CAMPAIGN CLAIMS AND
RAISES QUESTIONS DEFENDS THEIR
CAMPAIGN CLAIMS AND
RAISES QUESTIONS ABOUT CAMPAIGN CLAIMS AND
RAISES QUESTIONS ABOUT CAMPAIGN CLAIMS AND
RAISES QUESTIONS ABOUT
THE CAMPAIGN CLAIMS AND
RAISES QUESTIONS ABOUT
THE OPPOSING CAMPAIGN CLAIMS AND
RAISES QUESTIONS ABOUT
THE OPPOSING POLITICAL RAISES QUESTIONS ABOUT
THE OPPOSING POLITICAL RAISES QUESTIONS ABOUT
THE OPPOSING POLITICAL
CAMPAIGN, RAISES QUESTIONS ABOUT
THE OPPOSING POLITICAL
CAMPAIGN, IDAHO RAISES QUESTIONS ABOUT
THE OPPOSING POLITICAL
CAMPAIGN, IDAHO UNITED THE OPPOSING POLITICAL
CAMPAIGN, IDAHO UNITED THE OPPOSING POLITICAL
CAMPAIGN, IDAHO UNITED
AGAINST THE OPPOSING POLITICAL
CAMPAIGN, IDAHO UNITED
AGAINST PROP THE OPPOSING POLITICAL
CAMPAIGN, IDAHO UNITED
AGAINST PROP 1. CAMPAIGN, IDAHO UNITED
AGAINST PROP 1. CAMPAIGN, IDAHO UNITED
AGAINST PROP 1.
“YOU CAMPAIGN, IDAHO UNITED
AGAINST PROP 1.
“YOU WATCHING CAMPAIGN, IDAHO UNITED
AGAINST PROP 1.
“YOU WATCHING THIS AGAINST PROP 1.
“YOU WATCHING THIS AGAINST PROP 1.
“YOU WATCHING THIS
IDAHO? “YOU WATCHING THIS
IDAHO? “YOU WATCHING THIS
IDAHO?
“PROP “YOU WATCHING THIS
IDAHO?
“PROP ONE “YOU WATCHING THIS
IDAHO?
“PROP ONE IS “YOU WATCHING THIS
IDAHO?
“PROP ONE IS ABOUT IDAHO?
“PROP ONE IS ABOUT IDAHO?
“PROP ONE IS ABOUT
MACHINES.” IDAHO?
“PROP ONE IS ABOUT
MACHINES.” “WOAH IDAHO?
“PROP ONE IS ABOUT
MACHINES.” “WOAH NOW, “PROP ONE IS ABOUT
MACHINES.” “WOAH NOW, “PROP ONE IS ABOUT
MACHINES.” “WOAH NOW,
HOLD “PROP ONE IS ABOUT
MACHINES.” “WOAH NOW,
HOLD YOUR “PROP ONE IS ABOUT
MACHINES.” “WOAH NOW,
HOLD YOUR HORSES. MACHINES.” “WOAH NOW,
HOLD YOUR HORSES. MACHINES.” “WOAH NOW,
HOLD YOUR HORSES.
PROPOSITION MACHINES.” “WOAH NOW,
HOLD YOUR HORSES.
PROPOSITION ONE MACHINES.” “WOAH NOW,
HOLD YOUR HORSES.
PROPOSITION ONE IS HOLD YOUR HORSES.
PROPOSITION ONE IS HOLD YOUR HORSES.
PROPOSITION ONE IS
ABOUT HOLD YOUR HORSES.
PROPOSITION ONE IS
ABOUT MACHINES, PROPOSITION ONE IS
ABOUT MACHINES, PROPOSITION ONE IS
ABOUT MACHINES,
SPECIFICALLY PROPOSITION ONE IS
ABOUT MACHINES,
SPECIFICALLY ITS PROPOSITION ONE IS
ABOUT MACHINES,
SPECIFICALLY ITS A PROPOSITION ONE IS
ABOUT MACHINES,
SPECIFICALLY ITS A VOTE ABOUT MACHINES,
SPECIFICALLY ITS A VOTE ABOUT MACHINES,
SPECIFICALLY ITS A VOTE
TO ABOUT MACHINES,
SPECIFICALLY ITS A VOTE
TO LEGALIZE ABOUT MACHINES,
SPECIFICALLY ITS A VOTE
TO LEGALIZE HISTORICAL SPECIFICALLY ITS A VOTE
TO LEGALIZE HISTORICAL SPECIFICALLY ITS A VOTE
TO LEGALIZE HISTORICAL
HORSE SPECIFICALLY ITS A VOTE
TO LEGALIZE HISTORICAL
HORSE RACING TO LEGALIZE HISTORICAL
HORSE RACING TO LEGALIZE HISTORICAL
HORSE RACING
MACHINES. HORSE RACING
MACHINES. HORSE RACING
MACHINES.
WE’VE HORSE RACING
MACHINES.
WE’VE EXPLAINED MACHINES.
WE’VE EXPLAINED MACHINES.
WE’VE EXPLAINED
RECENTLY MACHINES.
WE’VE EXPLAINED
RECENTLY THAT MACHINES.
WE’VE EXPLAINED
RECENTLY THAT THOSE WE’VE EXPLAINED
RECENTLY THAT THOSE WE’VE EXPLAINED
RECENTLY THAT THOSE
MACHINES WE’VE EXPLAINED
RECENTLY THAT THOSE
MACHINES ARE RECENTLY THAT THOSE
MACHINES ARE RECENTLY THAT THOSE
MACHINES ARE
ELECTRONIC RECENTLY THAT THOSE
MACHINES ARE
ELECTRONIC GAMBLING MACHINES ARE
ELECTRONIC GAMBLING MACHINES ARE
ELECTRONIC GAMBLING
SYSTEMS MACHINES ARE
ELECTRONIC GAMBLING
SYSTEMS WHERE MACHINES ARE
ELECTRONIC GAMBLING
SYSTEMS WHERE PLAYERS ELECTRONIC GAMBLING
SYSTEMS WHERE PLAYERS ELECTRONIC GAMBLING
SYSTEMS WHERE PLAYERS
BET ELECTRONIC GAMBLING
SYSTEMS WHERE PLAYERS
BET ON ELECTRONIC GAMBLING
SYSTEMS WHERE PLAYERS
BET ON RANDOM, ELECTRONIC GAMBLING
SYSTEMS WHERE PLAYERS
BET ON RANDOM, OLD SYSTEMS WHERE PLAYERS
BET ON RANDOM, OLD SYSTEMS WHERE PLAYERS
BET ON RANDOM, OLD
RACES. BET ON RANDOM, OLD
RACES. BET ON RANDOM, OLD
RACES.
THE BET ON RANDOM, OLD
RACES.
THE CONTROVERSY? RACES.
THE CONTROVERSY? RACES.
THE CONTROVERSY?
CRITICS RACES.
THE CONTROVERSY?
CRITICS SAY RACES.
THE CONTROVERSY?
CRITICS SAY THEY RACES.
THE CONTROVERSY?
CRITICS SAY THEY LOOK, THE CONTROVERSY?
CRITICS SAY THEY LOOK, THE CONTROVERSY?
CRITICS SAY THEY LOOK,
SOUND, THE CONTROVERSY?
CRITICS SAY THEY LOOK,
SOUND, AND THE CONTROVERSY?
CRITICS SAY THEY LOOK,
SOUND, AND ACT THE CONTROVERSY?
CRITICS SAY THEY LOOK,
SOUND, AND ACT LIKE CRITICS SAY THEY LOOK,
SOUND, AND ACT LIKE CRITICS SAY THEY LOOK,
SOUND, AND ACT LIKE
SLOT CRITICS SAY THEY LOOK,
SOUND, AND ACT LIKE
SLOT MACHINES. SOUND, AND ACT LIKE
SLOT MACHINES. SOUND, AND ACT LIKE
SLOT MACHINES.
REGARDLESS, SOUND, AND ACT LIKE
SLOT MACHINES.
REGARDLESS, PROP SOUND, AND ACT LIKE
SLOT MACHINES.
REGARDLESS, PROP ONE SLOT MACHINES.
REGARDLESS, PROP ONE SLOT MACHINES.
REGARDLESS, PROP ONE
ISN’T SLOT MACHINES.
REGARDLESS, PROP ONE
ISN’T ABOUT SLOT MACHINES.
REGARDLESS, PROP ONE
ISN’T ABOUT LEGALIZING REGARDLESS, PROP ONE
ISN’T ABOUT LEGALIZING REGARDLESS, PROP ONE
ISN’T ABOUT LEGALIZING
HORSE REGARDLESS, PROP ONE
ISN’T ABOUT LEGALIZING
HORSE RACING, REGARDLESS, PROP ONE
ISN’T ABOUT LEGALIZING
HORSE RACING, THAT REGARDLESS, PROP ONE
ISN’T ABOUT LEGALIZING
HORSE RACING, THAT IS ISN’T ABOUT LEGALIZING
HORSE RACING, THAT IS ISN’T ABOUT LEGALIZING
HORSE RACING, THAT IS
ALREADY ISN’T ABOUT LEGALIZING
HORSE RACING, THAT IS
ALREADY LEGAL ISN’T ABOUT LEGALIZING
HORSE RACING, THAT IS
ALREADY LEGAL IN ISN’T ABOUT LEGALIZING
HORSE RACING, THAT IS
ALREADY LEGAL IN IDAHO. HORSE RACING, THAT IS
ALREADY LEGAL IN IDAHO. HORSE RACING, THAT IS
ALREADY LEGAL IN IDAHO.
IT’S HORSE RACING, THAT IS
ALREADY LEGAL IN IDAHO.
IT’S ALL HORSE RACING, THAT IS
ALREADY LEGAL IN IDAHO.
IT’S ALL ABOUT ALREADY LEGAL IN IDAHO.
IT’S ALL ABOUT ALREADY LEGAL IN IDAHO.
IT’S ALL ABOUT
LEGALIZING ALREADY LEGAL IN IDAHO.
IT’S ALL ABOUT
LEGALIZING THESE IT’S ALL ABOUT
LEGALIZING THESE IT’S ALL ABOUT
LEGALIZING THESE
GAMBLING IT’S ALL ABOUT
LEGALIZING THESE
GAMBLING MACHINES. LEGALIZING THESE
GAMBLING MACHINES. LEGALIZING THESE
GAMBLING MACHINES.
“IDAHO LEGALIZING THESE
GAMBLING MACHINES.
“IDAHO NEWS LEGALIZING THESE
GAMBLING MACHINES.
“IDAHO NEWS MEDIA GAMBLING MACHINES.
“IDAHO NEWS MEDIA GAMBLING MACHINES.
“IDAHO NEWS MEDIA
CALLS GAMBLING MACHINES.
“IDAHO NEWS MEDIA
CALLS THESE GAMBLING MACHINES.
“IDAHO NEWS MEDIA
CALLS THESE ADS GAMBLING MACHINES.
“IDAHO NEWS MEDIA
CALLS THESE ADS AN “IDAHO NEWS MEDIA
CALLS THESE ADS AN “IDAHO NEWS MEDIA
CALLS THESE ADS AN
EXAGGERATION.” CALLS THESE ADS AN
EXAGGERATION.” CALLS THESE ADS AN
EXAGGERATION.”
THIS CALLS THESE ADS AN
EXAGGERATION.”
THIS ARGUMENT CALLS THESE ADS AN
EXAGGERATION.”
THIS ARGUMENT IS EXAGGERATION.”
THIS ARGUMENT IS EXAGGERATION.”
THIS ARGUMENT IS
HIGHLIGHTED EXAGGERATION.”
THIS ARGUMENT IS
HIGHLIGHTED BY EXAGGERATION.”
THIS ARGUMENT IS
HIGHLIGHTED BY A EXAGGERATION.”
THIS ARGUMENT IS
HIGHLIGHTED BY A SINGLE THIS ARGUMENT IS
HIGHLIGHTED BY A SINGLE THIS ARGUMENT IS
HIGHLIGHTED BY A SINGLE
SNIPPET THIS ARGUMENT IS
HIGHLIGHTED BY A SINGLE
SNIPPET FROM THIS ARGUMENT IS
HIGHLIGHTED BY A SINGLE
SNIPPET FROM A HIGHLIGHTED BY A SINGLE
SNIPPET FROM A HIGHLIGHTED BY A SINGLE
SNIPPET FROM A
SEPTEMBER HIGHLIGHTED BY A SINGLE
SNIPPET FROM A
SEPTEMBER 4TH HIGHLIGHTED BY A SINGLE
SNIPPET FROM A
SEPTEMBER 4TH IDAHO SNIPPET FROM A
SEPTEMBER 4TH IDAHO SNIPPET FROM A
SEPTEMBER 4TH IDAHO
PRESS SNIPPET FROM A
SEPTEMBER 4TH IDAHO
PRESS ARTICLE. SEPTEMBER 4TH IDAHO
PRESS ARTICLE. SEPTEMBER 4TH IDAHO
PRESS ARTICLE.
THE SEPTEMBER 4TH IDAHO
PRESS ARTICLE.
THE FULL SEPTEMBER 4TH IDAHO
PRESS ARTICLE.
THE FULL CONTEXT SEPTEMBER 4TH IDAHO
PRESS ARTICLE.
THE FULL CONTEXT OF PRESS ARTICLE.
THE FULL CONTEXT OF PRESS ARTICLE.
THE FULL CONTEXT OF
THAT PRESS ARTICLE.
THE FULL CONTEXT OF
THAT QUOTE PRESS ARTICLE.
THE FULL CONTEXT OF
THAT QUOTE IS PRESS ARTICLE.
THE FULL CONTEXT OF
THAT QUOTE IS NOT THE FULL CONTEXT OF
THAT QUOTE IS NOT THE FULL CONTEXT OF
THAT QUOTE IS NOT
ABOUT THE FULL CONTEXT OF
THAT QUOTE IS NOT
ABOUT THE THE FULL CONTEXT OF
THAT QUOTE IS NOT
ABOUT THE ENTIRE THE FULL CONTEXT OF
THAT QUOTE IS NOT
ABOUT THE ENTIRE ANTI THAT QUOTE IS NOT
ABOUT THE ENTIRE ANTI THAT QUOTE IS NOT
ABOUT THE ENTIRE ANTI
PROP-ONE THAT QUOTE IS NOT
ABOUT THE ENTIRE ANTI
PROP-ONE AD THAT QUOTE IS NOT
ABOUT THE ENTIRE ANTI
PROP-ONE AD BEING THAT QUOTE IS NOT
ABOUT THE ENTIRE ANTI
PROP-ONE AD BEING AN ABOUT THE ENTIRE ANTI
PROP-ONE AD BEING AN ABOUT THE ENTIRE ANTI
PROP-ONE AD BEING AN
EXAGGERATION, ABOUT THE ENTIRE ANTI
PROP-ONE AD BEING AN
EXAGGERATION, BUT PROP-ONE AD BEING AN
EXAGGERATION, BUT PROP-ONE AD BEING AN
EXAGGERATION, BUT
RATHER PROP-ONE AD BEING AN
EXAGGERATION, BUT
RATHER ONE PROP-ONE AD BEING AN
EXAGGERATION, BUT
RATHER ONE SPECIFIC EXAGGERATION, BUT
RATHER ONE SPECIFIC EXAGGERATION, BUT
RATHER ONE SPECIFIC
POINT EXAGGERATION, BUT
RATHER ONE SPECIFIC
POINT MADE EXAGGERATION, BUT
RATHER ONE SPECIFIC
POINT MADE BY EXAGGERATION, BUT
RATHER ONE SPECIFIC
POINT MADE BY THE RATHER ONE SPECIFIC
POINT MADE BY THE RATHER ONE SPECIFIC
POINT MADE BY THE
COMPETING RATHER ONE SPECIFIC
POINT MADE BY THE
COMPETING CAMPAIGN.. POINT MADE BY THE
COMPETING CAMPAIGN.. POINT MADE BY THE
COMPETING CAMPAIGN..
THE POINT MADE BY THE
COMPETING CAMPAIGN..
THE ARTICLE POINT MADE BY THE
COMPETING CAMPAIGN..
THE ARTICLE TOOK POINT MADE BY THE
COMPETING CAMPAIGN..
THE ARTICLE TOOK ISSUE COMPETING CAMPAIGN..
THE ARTICLE TOOK ISSUE COMPETING CAMPAIGN..
THE ARTICLE TOOK ISSUE
WITH COMPETING CAMPAIGN..
THE ARTICLE TOOK ISSUE
WITH THE COMPETING CAMPAIGN..
THE ARTICLE TOOK ISSUE
WITH THE CLAIM COMPETING CAMPAIGN..
THE ARTICLE TOOK ISSUE
WITH THE CLAIM THAT THE ARTICLE TOOK ISSUE
WITH THE CLAIM THAT THE ARTICLE TOOK ISSUE
WITH THE CLAIM THAT
PROP THE ARTICLE TOOK ISSUE
WITH THE CLAIM THAT
PROP ONE THE ARTICLE TOOK ISSUE
WITH THE CLAIM THAT
PROP ONE WILL THE ARTICLE TOOK ISSUE
WITH THE CLAIM THAT
PROP ONE WILL ALLOW WITH THE CLAIM THAT
PROP ONE WILL ALLOW WITH THE CLAIM THAT
PROP ONE WILL ALLOW
AN WITH THE CLAIM THAT
PROP ONE WILL ALLOW
AN UNLIMITED WITH THE CLAIM THAT
PROP ONE WILL ALLOW
AN UNLIMITED NUMBER PROP ONE WILL ALLOW
AN UNLIMITED NUMBER PROP ONE WILL ALLOW
AN UNLIMITED NUMBER
OF PROP ONE WILL ALLOW
AN UNLIMITED NUMBER
OF MACHINES PROP ONE WILL ALLOW
AN UNLIMITED NUMBER
OF MACHINES IN PROP ONE WILL ALLOW
AN UNLIMITED NUMBER
OF MACHINES IN CASINOS AN UNLIMITED NUMBER
OF MACHINES IN CASINOS AN UNLIMITED NUMBER
OF MACHINES IN CASINOS
AT AN UNLIMITED NUMBER
OF MACHINES IN CASINOS
AT HORSE AN UNLIMITED NUMBER
OF MACHINES IN CASINOS
AT HORSE AND AN UNLIMITED NUMBER
OF MACHINES IN CASINOS
AT HORSE AND DOG OF MACHINES IN CASINOS
AT HORSE AND DOG OF MACHINES IN CASINOS
AT HORSE AND DOG
TRACKS OF MACHINES IN CASINOS
AT HORSE AND DOG
TRACKS ACROSS OF MACHINES IN CASINOS
AT HORSE AND DOG
TRACKS ACROSS IDAHO, AT HORSE AND DOG
TRACKS ACROSS IDAHO, AT HORSE AND DOG
TRACKS ACROSS IDAHO,
EVEN AT HORSE AND DOG
TRACKS ACROSS IDAHO,
EVEN IF AT HORSE AND DOG
TRACKS ACROSS IDAHO,
EVEN IF NO AT HORSE AND DOG
TRACKS ACROSS IDAHO,
EVEN IF NO RACING AT HORSE AND DOG
TRACKS ACROSS IDAHO,
EVEN IF NO RACING IS TRACKS ACROSS IDAHO,
EVEN IF NO RACING IS TRACKS ACROSS IDAHO,
EVEN IF NO RACING IS
TAKING TRACKS ACROSS IDAHO,
EVEN IF NO RACING IS
TAKING PLACE.” EVEN IF NO RACING IS
TAKING PLACE.” EVEN IF NO RACING IS
TAKING PLACE.”
WE EVEN IF NO RACING IS
TAKING PLACE.”
WE CLARIFIED EVEN IF NO RACING IS
TAKING PLACE.”
WE CLARIFIED THIS EVEN IF NO RACING IS
TAKING PLACE.”
WE CLARIFIED THIS IN TAKING PLACE.”
WE CLARIFIED THIS IN TAKING PLACE.”
WE CLARIFIED THIS IN
OUR TAKING PLACE.”
WE CLARIFIED THIS IN
OUR LAST TAKING PLACE.”
WE CLARIFIED THIS IN
OUR LAST AD-WATCH WE CLARIFIED THIS IN
OUR LAST AD-WATCH WE CLARIFIED THIS IN
OUR LAST AD-WATCH
REPORT. OUR LAST AD-WATCH
REPORT. OUR LAST AD-WATCH
REPORT.
HISTORICAL OUR LAST AD-WATCH
REPORT.
HISTORICAL HORSE REPORT.
HISTORICAL HORSE REPORT.
HISTORICAL HORSE
RACING REPORT.
HISTORICAL HORSE
RACING MACHINES HISTORICAL HORSE
RACING MACHINES HISTORICAL HORSE
RACING MACHINES
WOULD HISTORICAL HORSE
RACING MACHINES
WOULD ONLY HISTORICAL HORSE
RACING MACHINES
WOULD ONLY BE RACING MACHINES
WOULD ONLY BE RACING MACHINES
WOULD ONLY BE
ALLOWED RACING MACHINES
WOULD ONLY BE
ALLOWED AT RACING MACHINES
WOULD ONLY BE
ALLOWED AT VENUES WOULD ONLY BE
ALLOWED AT VENUES WOULD ONLY BE
ALLOWED AT VENUES
THAT WOULD ONLY BE
ALLOWED AT VENUES
THAT FOLLOW WOULD ONLY BE
ALLOWED AT VENUES
THAT FOLLOW SPECIFIC ALLOWED AT VENUES
THAT FOLLOW SPECIFIC ALLOWED AT VENUES
THAT FOLLOW SPECIFIC
CRITERIA, ALLOWED AT VENUES
THAT FOLLOW SPECIFIC
CRITERIA, WHICH THAT FOLLOW SPECIFIC
CRITERIA, WHICH THAT FOLLOW SPECIFIC
CRITERIA, WHICH
INCLUDES THAT FOLLOW SPECIFIC
CRITERIA, WHICH
INCLUDES HAVING THAT FOLLOW SPECIFIC
CRITERIA, WHICH
INCLUDES HAVING 8 THAT FOLLOW SPECIFIC
CRITERIA, WHICH
INCLUDES HAVING 8 LIVE CRITERIA, WHICH
INCLUDES HAVING 8 LIVE CRITERIA, WHICH
INCLUDES HAVING 8 LIVE
RACING CRITERIA, WHICH
INCLUDES HAVING 8 LIVE
RACING DAYS CRITERIA, WHICH
INCLUDES HAVING 8 LIVE
RACING DAYS A CRITERIA, WHICH
INCLUDES HAVING 8 LIVE
RACING DAYS A YEAR. INCLUDES HAVING 8 LIVE
RACING DAYS A YEAR. INCLUDES HAVING 8 LIVE
RACING DAYS A YEAR.
THOSE INCLUDES HAVING 8 LIVE
RACING DAYS A YEAR.
THOSE PLACES INCLUDES HAVING 8 LIVE
RACING DAYS A YEAR.
THOSE PLACES HOWEVER RACING DAYS A YEAR.
THOSE PLACES HOWEVER RACING DAYS A YEAR.
THOSE PLACES HOWEVER
WOULD RACING DAYS A YEAR.
THOSE PLACES HOWEVER
WOULD BE RACING DAYS A YEAR.
THOSE PLACES HOWEVER
WOULD BE ALLOWED RACING DAYS A YEAR.
THOSE PLACES HOWEVER
WOULD BE ALLOWED TO THOSE PLACES HOWEVER
WOULD BE ALLOWED TO THOSE PLACES HOWEVER
WOULD BE ALLOWED TO
HAVE THOSE PLACES HOWEVER
WOULD BE ALLOWED TO
HAVE AS THOSE PLACES HOWEVER
WOULD BE ALLOWED TO
HAVE AS MANY THOSE PLACES HOWEVER
WOULD BE ALLOWED TO
HAVE AS MANY MACHINES WOULD BE ALLOWED TO
HAVE AS MANY MACHINES WOULD BE ALLOWED TO
HAVE AS MANY MACHINES
AS WOULD BE ALLOWED TO
HAVE AS MANY MACHINES
AS THEY WOULD BE ALLOWED TO
HAVE AS MANY MACHINES
AS THEY WANT WOULD BE ALLOWED TO
HAVE AS MANY MACHINES
AS THEY WANT IN WOULD BE ALLOWED TO
HAVE AS MANY MACHINES
AS THEY WANT IN THEIR HAVE AS MANY MACHINES
AS THEY WANT IN THEIR HAVE AS MANY MACHINES
AS THEY WANT IN THEIR
BUILDING. AS THEY WANT IN THEIR
BUILDING. AS THEY WANT IN THEIR
BUILDING.
“AND AS THEY WANT IN THEIR
BUILDING.
“AND WHO AS THEY WANT IN THEIR
BUILDING.
“AND WHO IS AS THEY WANT IN THEIR
BUILDING.
“AND WHO IS PAYING AS THEY WANT IN THEIR
BUILDING.
“AND WHO IS PAYING FOR BUILDING.
“AND WHO IS PAYING FOR BUILDING.
“AND WHO IS PAYING FOR
IT? BUILDING.
“AND WHO IS PAYING FOR
IT? OUT BUILDING.
“AND WHO IS PAYING FOR
IT? OUT OF BUILDING.
“AND WHO IS PAYING FOR
IT? OUT OF STATE BUILDING.
“AND WHO IS PAYING FOR
IT? OUT OF STATE CASINO “AND WHO IS PAYING FOR
IT? OUT OF STATE CASINO “AND WHO IS PAYING FOR
IT? OUT OF STATE CASINO
INTERESTS? “AND WHO IS PAYING FOR
IT? OUT OF STATE CASINO
INTERESTS? THEY “AND WHO IS PAYING FOR
IT? OUT OF STATE CASINO
INTERESTS? THEY HAVEN’T IT? OUT OF STATE CASINO
INTERESTS? THEY HAVEN’T IT? OUT OF STATE CASINO
INTERESTS? THEY HAVEN’T
TOLD IT? OUT OF STATE CASINO
INTERESTS? THEY HAVEN’T
TOLD US.” INTERESTS? THEY HAVEN’T
TOLD US.” INTERESTS? THEY HAVEN’T
TOLD US.”
WE INTERESTS? THEY HAVEN’T
TOLD US.”
WE KNOW INTERESTS? THEY HAVEN’T
TOLD US.”
WE KNOW THAT INTERESTS? THEY HAVEN’T
TOLD US.”
WE KNOW THAT AN INTERESTS? THEY HAVEN’T
TOLD US.”
WE KNOW THAT AN IN TOLD US.”
WE KNOW THAT AN IN TOLD US.”
WE KNOW THAT AN IN
STATE TOLD US.”
WE KNOW THAT AN IN
STATE POLITICAL TOLD US.”
WE KNOW THAT AN IN
STATE POLITICAL ACTION WE KNOW THAT AN IN
STATE POLITICAL ACTION WE KNOW THAT AN IN
STATE POLITICAL ACTION
COMMITTEE, WE KNOW THAT AN IN
STATE POLITICAL ACTION
COMMITTEE, IDAHO STATE POLITICAL ACTION
COMMITTEE, IDAHO STATE POLITICAL ACTION
COMMITTEE, IDAHO
UNITED STATE POLITICAL ACTION
COMMITTEE, IDAHO
UNITED AGAINST STATE POLITICAL ACTION
COMMITTEE, IDAHO
UNITED AGAINST PROP STATE POLITICAL ACTION
COMMITTEE, IDAHO
UNITED AGAINST PROP 1, COMMITTEE, IDAHO
UNITED AGAINST PROP 1, COMMITTEE, IDAHO
UNITED AGAINST PROP 1,
PAID COMMITTEE, IDAHO
UNITED AGAINST PROP 1,
PAID FOR COMMITTEE, IDAHO
UNITED AGAINST PROP 1,
PAID FOR THE COMMITTEE, IDAHO
UNITED AGAINST PROP 1,
PAID FOR THE MENTIONED UNITED AGAINST PROP 1,
PAID FOR THE MENTIONED UNITED AGAINST PROP 1,
PAID FOR THE MENTIONED
AD. PAID FOR THE MENTIONED
AD. PAID FOR THE MENTIONED
AD.
IT’S PAID FOR THE MENTIONED
AD.
IT’S PRESENTED PAID FOR THE MENTIONED
AD.
IT’S PRESENTED VERY AD.
IT’S PRESENTED VERY AD.
IT’S PRESENTED VERY
CLEARLY. IT’S PRESENTED VERY
CLEARLY. IT’S PRESENTED VERY
CLEARLY.
WHAT’S IT’S PRESENTED VERY
CLEARLY.
WHAT’S NOT IT’S PRESENTED VERY
CLEARLY.
WHAT’S NOT CLEAR IT’S PRESENTED VERY
CLEARLY.
WHAT’S NOT CLEAR IS CLEARLY.
WHAT’S NOT CLEAR IS CLEARLY.
WHAT’S NOT CLEAR IS
WHO CLEARLY.
WHAT’S NOT CLEAR IS
WHO HAS CLEARLY.
WHAT’S NOT CLEAR IS
WHO HAS CONTRIBUTED WHAT’S NOT CLEAR IS
WHO HAS CONTRIBUTED WHAT’S NOT CLEAR IS
WHO HAS CONTRIBUTED
TO WHAT’S NOT CLEAR IS
WHO HAS CONTRIBUTED
TO THAT WHAT’S NOT CLEAR IS
WHO HAS CONTRIBUTED
TO THAT CAMPAIGN. WHO HAS CONTRIBUTED
TO THAT CAMPAIGN. WHO HAS CONTRIBUTED
TO THAT CAMPAIGN.
BUT WHO HAS CONTRIBUTED
TO THAT CAMPAIGN.
BUT WE WHO HAS CONTRIBUTED
TO THAT CAMPAIGN.
BUT WE COULD WHO HAS CONTRIBUTED
TO THAT CAMPAIGN.
BUT WE COULD KNOW TO THAT CAMPAIGN.
BUT WE COULD KNOW TO THAT CAMPAIGN.
BUT WE COULD KNOW
RIGHT TO THAT CAMPAIGN.
BUT WE COULD KNOW
RIGHT AROUND TO THAT CAMPAIGN.
BUT WE COULD KNOW
RIGHT AROUND OCTOBER BUT WE COULD KNOW
RIGHT AROUND OCTOBER BUT WE COULD KNOW
RIGHT AROUND OCTOBER
10TH BUT WE COULD KNOW
RIGHT AROUND OCTOBER
10TH — BUT WE COULD KNOW
RIGHT AROUND OCTOBER
10TH — THAT’S BUT WE COULD KNOW
RIGHT AROUND OCTOBER
10TH — THAT’S WHEN RIGHT AROUND OCTOBER
10TH — THAT’S WHEN RIGHT AROUND OCTOBER
10TH — THAT’S WHEN
CAMPAIGN RIGHT AROUND OCTOBER
10TH — THAT’S WHEN
CAMPAIGN FINANCE 10TH — THAT’S WHEN
CAMPAIGN FINANCE 10TH — THAT’S WHEN
CAMPAIGN FINANCE
REPORTS 10TH — THAT’S WHEN
CAMPAIGN FINANCE
REPORTS ARE 10TH — THAT’S WHEN
CAMPAIGN FINANCE
REPORTS ARE DUE. CAMPAIGN FINANCE
REPORTS ARE DUE. CAMPAIGN FINANCE
REPORTS ARE DUE.
I CAMPAIGN FINANCE
REPORTS ARE DUE.
I REACHED CAMPAIGN FINANCE
REPORTS ARE DUE.
I REACHED OUT CAMPAIGN FINANCE
REPORTS ARE DUE.
I REACHED OUT TO CAMPAIGN FINANCE
REPORTS ARE DUE.
I REACHED OUT TO IDAHO REPORTS ARE DUE.
I REACHED OUT TO IDAHO REPORTS ARE DUE.
I REACHED OUT TO IDAHO
UNITED REPORTS ARE DUE.
I REACHED OUT TO IDAHO
UNITED AGAINST REPORTS ARE DUE.
I REACHED OUT TO IDAHO
UNITED AGAINST PROP REPORTS ARE DUE.
I REACHED OUT TO IDAHO
UNITED AGAINST PROP 1…. I REACHED OUT TO IDAHO
UNITED AGAINST PROP 1…. UNITED AGAINST PROP 1…. A A SPOKESPERSON A SPOKESPERSON TELLS A SPOKESPERSON TELLS
ME A SPOKESPERSON TELLS
ME THEPAC A SPOKESPERSON TELLS
ME THEPAC IS A SPOKESPERSON TELLS
ME THEPAC IS PLANNING A SPOKESPERSON TELLS
ME THEPAC IS PLANNING
ON A SPOKESPERSON TELLS
ME THEPAC IS PLANNING
ON SHARING A SPOKESPERSON TELLS
ME THEPAC IS PLANNING
ON SHARING SOME ME THEPAC IS PLANNING
ON SHARING SOME ME THEPAC IS PLANNING
ON SHARING SOME
FINANCIAL ME THEPAC IS PLANNING
ON SHARING SOME
FINANCIAL INFORMATION ON SHARING SOME
FINANCIAL INFORMATION ON SHARING SOME
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PRIOR ON SHARING SOME
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PRIOR TO ON SHARING SOME
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PRIOR TO THE ON SHARING SOME
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PRIOR TO THE REPORTING FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PRIOR TO THE REPORTING FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PRIOR TO THE REPORTING
DEADLINE. PRIOR TO THE REPORTING
DEADLINE. PRIOR TO THE REPORTING
DEADLINE.
“MEANWHILE PRIOR TO THE REPORTING
DEADLINE.
“MEANWHILE OUR PRIOR TO THE REPORTING
DEADLINE.
“MEANWHILE OUR IDAHO DEADLINE.
“MEANWHILE OUR IDAHO DEADLINE.
“MEANWHILE OUR IDAHO
CAMPAIGN DEADLINE.
“MEANWHILE OUR IDAHO
CAMPAIGN TO DEADLINE.
“MEANWHILE OUR IDAHO
CAMPAIGN TO BRING “MEANWHILE OUR IDAHO
CAMPAIGN TO BRING CAMPAIGN TO BRING BACK BACK HORSE BACK HORSE RACING BACK HORSE RACING WILL BACK HORSE RACING WILL
CREATE BACK HORSE RACING WILL
CREATE HUNDREDS BACK HORSE RACING WILL
CREATE HUNDREDS OF BACK HORSE RACING WILL
CREATE HUNDREDS OF
JOBS, BACK HORSE RACING WILL
CREATE HUNDREDS OF
JOBS, INVEST BACK HORSE RACING WILL
CREATE HUNDREDS OF
JOBS, INVEST MILLIONS BACK HORSE RACING WILL
CREATE HUNDREDS OF
JOBS, INVEST MILLIONS IN CREATE HUNDREDS OF
JOBS, INVEST MILLIONS IN CREATE HUNDREDS OF
JOBS, INVEST MILLIONS IN
CLASSROOMS CREATE HUNDREDS OF
JOBS, INVEST MILLIONS IN
CLASSROOMS AND CREATE HUNDREDS OF
JOBS, INVEST MILLIONS IN
CLASSROOMS AND DO CREATE HUNDREDS OF
JOBS, INVEST MILLIONS IN
CLASSROOMS AND DO IT JOBS, INVEST MILLIONS IN
CLASSROOMS AND DO IT JOBS, INVEST MILLIONS IN
CLASSROOMS AND DO IT
ALL JOBS, INVEST MILLIONS IN
CLASSROOMS AND DO IT
ALL WITH JOBS, INVEST MILLIONS IN
CLASSROOMS AND DO IT
ALL WITH REAL CLASSROOMS AND DO IT
ALL WITH REAL CLASSROOMS AND DO IT
ALL WITH REAL
ACCOUNTABILITY.” ALL WITH REAL
ACCOUNTABILITY.” ALL WITH REAL
ACCOUNTABILITY.”
IN ALL WITH REAL
ACCOUNTABILITY.”
IN A ALL WITH REAL
ACCOUNTABILITY.”
IN A PREVIOUS ALL WITH REAL
ACCOUNTABILITY.”
IN A PREVIOUS REPORT, ACCOUNTABILITY.”
IN A PREVIOUS REPORT, ACCOUNTABILITY.”
IN A PREVIOUS REPORT,
WE ACCOUNTABILITY.”
IN A PREVIOUS REPORT,
WE WENT ACCOUNTABILITY.”
IN A PREVIOUS REPORT,
WE WENT THROUGH IN A PREVIOUS REPORT,
WE WENT THROUGH IN A PREVIOUS REPORT,
WE WENT THROUGH
THESE IN A PREVIOUS REPORT,
WE WENT THROUGH
THESE CLAIMS IN A PREVIOUS REPORT,
WE WENT THROUGH
THESE CLAIMS AS IN A PREVIOUS REPORT,
WE WENT THROUGH
THESE CLAIMS AS THE WE WENT THROUGH
THESE CLAIMS AS THE WE WENT THROUGH
THESE CLAIMS AS THE
NEW WE WENT THROUGH
THESE CLAIMS AS THE
NEW AD WE WENT THROUGH
THESE CLAIMS AS THE
NEW AD MENTIONS. THESE CLAIMS AS THE
NEW AD MENTIONS. THESE CLAIMS AS THE
NEW AD MENTIONS.
“AND THESE CLAIMS AS THE
NEW AD MENTIONS.
“AND LOCAL THESE CLAIMS AS THE
NEW AD MENTIONS.
“AND LOCAL NEWS THESE CLAIMS AS THE
NEW AD MENTIONS.
“AND LOCAL NEWS MEDIA, NEW AD MENTIONS.
“AND LOCAL NEWS MEDIA, NEW AD MENTIONS.
“AND LOCAL NEWS MEDIA,
VERIFIES NEW AD MENTIONS.
“AND LOCAL NEWS MEDIA,
VERIFIES THOSE NEW AD MENTIONS.
“AND LOCAL NEWS MEDIA,
VERIFIES THOSE CLAIMS “AND LOCAL NEWS MEDIA,
VERIFIES THOSE CLAIMS “AND LOCAL NEWS MEDIA,
VERIFIES THOSE CLAIMS
ARE “AND LOCAL NEWS MEDIA,
VERIFIES THOSE CLAIMS
ARE ACCURATE.” VERIFIES THOSE CLAIMS
ARE ACCURATE.” VERIFIES THOSE CLAIMS
ARE ACCURATE.”
THERE VERIFIES THOSE CLAIMS
ARE ACCURATE.”
THERE IS VERIFIES THOSE CLAIMS
ARE ACCURATE.”
THERE IS A VERIFIES THOSE CLAIMS
ARE ACCURATE.”
THERE IS A PROBLEM ARE ACCURATE.”
THERE IS A PROBLEM ARE ACCURATE.”
THERE IS A PROBLEM
THOUGH, ARE ACCURATE.”
THERE IS A PROBLEM
THOUGH, SAVE ARE ACCURATE.”
THERE IS A PROBLEM
THOUGH, SAVE IDAHO THERE IS A PROBLEM
THOUGH, SAVE IDAHO THERE IS A PROBLEM
THOUGH, SAVE IDAHO
HORSE THERE IS A PROBLEM
THOUGH, SAVE IDAHO
HORSE RACING THERE IS A PROBLEM
THOUGH, SAVE IDAHO
HORSE RACING EDITED THOUGH, SAVE IDAHO
HORSE RACING EDITED THOUGH, SAVE IDAHO
HORSE RACING EDITED
THE THOUGH, SAVE IDAHO
HORSE RACING EDITED
THE AUDIO THOUGH, SAVE IDAHO
HORSE RACING EDITED
THE AUDIO FROM THOUGH, SAVE IDAHO
HORSE RACING EDITED
THE AUDIO FROM OUR HORSE RACING EDITED
THE AUDIO FROM OUR HORSE RACING EDITED
THE AUDIO FROM OUR
NEWSCAST HORSE RACING EDITED
THE AUDIO FROM OUR
NEWSCAST FOR HORSE RACING EDITED
THE AUDIO FROM OUR
NEWSCAST FOR THEIR HORSE RACING EDITED
THE AUDIO FROM OUR
NEWSCAST FOR THEIR AD THE AUDIO FROM OUR
NEWSCAST FOR THEIR AD THE AUDIO FROM OUR
NEWSCAST FOR THEIR AD
TO THE AUDIO FROM OUR
NEWSCAST FOR THEIR AD
TO CHANGE THE AUDIO FROM OUR
NEWSCAST FOR THEIR AD
TO CHANGE WHAT THE AUDIO FROM OUR
NEWSCAST FOR THEIR AD
TO CHANGE WHAT OUR NEWSCAST FOR THEIR AD
TO CHANGE WHAT OUR NEWSCAST FOR THEIR AD
TO CHANGE WHAT OUR
MARK NEWSCAST FOR THEIR AD
TO CHANGE WHAT OUR
MARK JOHNSON NEWSCAST FOR THEIR AD
TO CHANGE WHAT OUR
MARK JOHNSON SAID, TO CHANGE WHAT OUR
MARK JOHNSON SAID, TO CHANGE WHAT OUR
MARK JOHNSON SAID,
WATCH. MARK JOHNSON SAID,
WATCH. WATCH. “OUR “OUR JOE “OUR JOE PARRIS “OUR JOE PARRIS VERIFIES “OUR JOE PARRIS VERIFIES
IF “OUR JOE PARRIS VERIFIES
IF THOSE “OUR JOE PARRIS VERIFIES
IF THOSE CLAIMS “OUR JOE PARRIS VERIFIES
IF THOSE CLAIMS ARE “OUR JOE PARRIS VERIFIES
IF THOSE CLAIMS ARE
ACCURATE.” IF THOSE CLAIMS ARE
ACCURATE.” IF THOSE CLAIMS ARE
ACCURATE.”
DID IF THOSE CLAIMS ARE
ACCURATE.”
DID YOU IF THOSE CLAIMS ARE
ACCURATE.”
DID YOU CATCH IF THOSE CLAIMS ARE
ACCURATE.”
DID YOU CATCH THE ACCURATE.”
DID YOU CATCH THE ACCURATE.”
DID YOU CATCH THE
DIFFERENCE? DID YOU CATCH THE
DIFFERENCE? DID YOU CATCH THE
DIFFERENCE?
THE DID YOU CATCH THE
DIFFERENCE?
THE AD DID YOU CATCH THE
DIFFERENCE?
THE AD VERY DID YOU CATCH THE
DIFFERENCE?
THE AD VERY SUBTLY DIFFERENCE?
THE AD VERY SUBTLY DIFFERENCE?
THE AD VERY SUBTLY
EDITED DIFFERENCE?
THE AD VERY SUBTLY
EDITED OUT DIFFERENCE?
THE AD VERY SUBTLY
EDITED OUT THE DIFFERENCE?
THE AD VERY SUBTLY
EDITED OUT THE WORD THE AD VERY SUBTLY
EDITED OUT THE WORD THE AD VERY SUBTLY
EDITED OUT THE WORD
IF. THE AD VERY SUBTLY
EDITED OUT THE WORD
IF. IN THE AD VERY SUBTLY
EDITED OUT THE WORD
IF. IN DOING THE AD VERY SUBTLY
EDITED OUT THE WORD
IF. IN DOING SO, THE AD VERY SUBTLY
EDITED OUT THE WORD
IF. IN DOING SO, THEY EDITED OUT THE WORD
IF. IN DOING SO, THEY EDITED OUT THE WORD
IF. IN DOING SO, THEY
CHANGED EDITED OUT THE WORD
IF. IN DOING SO, THEY
CHANGED THE EDITED OUT THE WORD
IF. IN DOING SO, THEY
CHANGED THE MEANING IF. IN DOING SO, THEY
CHANGED THE MEANING IF. IN DOING SO, THEY
CHANGED THE MEANING
OF IF. IN DOING SO, THEY
CHANGED THE MEANING
OF THE IF. IN DOING SO, THEY
CHANGED THE MEANING
OF THE SENTENCE. CHANGED THE MEANING
OF THE SENTENCE. OF THE SENTENCE. “IF, “IF, IF, “IF, IF, IF.” “IF, IF, IF.”
YOU “IF, IF, IF.”
YOU CAN “IF, IF, IF.”
YOU CAN SEE “IF, IF, IF.”
YOU CAN SEE IN “IF, IF, IF.”
YOU CAN SEE IN THE “IF, IF, IF.”
YOU CAN SEE IN THE AD, “IF, IF, IF.”
YOU CAN SEE IN THE AD,
THE “IF, IF, IF.”
YOU CAN SEE IN THE AD,
THE WORDS “IF, IF, IF.”
YOU CAN SEE IN THE AD,
THE WORDS DO “IF, IF, IF.”
YOU CAN SEE IN THE AD,
THE WORDS DO NOT YOU CAN SEE IN THE AD,
THE WORDS DO NOT YOU CAN SEE IN THE AD,
THE WORDS DO NOT
MATCH YOU CAN SEE IN THE AD,
THE WORDS DO NOT
MATCH MARK’S YOU CAN SEE IN THE AD,
THE WORDS DO NOT
MATCH MARK’S MOUTH.” THE WORDS DO NOT
MATCH MARK’S MOUTH.” THE WORDS DO NOT
MATCH MARK’S MOUTH.”
WE THE WORDS DO NOT
MATCH MARK’S MOUTH.”
WE VERIFIED THE WORDS DO NOT
MATCH MARK’S MOUTH.”
WE VERIFIED THAT THE WORDS DO NOT
MATCH MARK’S MOUTH.”
WE VERIFIED THAT THE MATCH MARK’S MOUTH.”
WE VERIFIED THAT THE MATCH MARK’S MOUTH.”
WE VERIFIED THAT THE
PASSING MATCH MARK’S MOUTH.”
WE VERIFIED THAT THE
PASSING OF MATCH MARK’S MOUTH.”
WE VERIFIED THAT THE
PASSING OF PROP MATCH MARK’S MOUTH.”
WE VERIFIED THAT THE
PASSING OF PROP ONE WE VERIFIED THAT THE
PASSING OF PROP ONE WE VERIFIED THAT THE
PASSING OF PROP ONE
WOULD, WE VERIFIED THAT THE
PASSING OF PROP ONE
WOULD, YES, WE VERIFIED THAT THE
PASSING OF PROP ONE
WOULD, YES, LIKELY PASSING OF PROP ONE
WOULD, YES, LIKELY PASSING OF PROP ONE
WOULD, YES, LIKELY
CREATE PASSING OF PROP ONE
WOULD, YES, LIKELY
CREATE HUNDREDS PASSING OF PROP ONE
WOULD, YES, LIKELY
CREATE HUNDREDS OF WOULD, YES, LIKELY
CREATE HUNDREDS OF WOULD, YES, LIKELY
CREATE HUNDREDS OF
JOBS, WOULD, YES, LIKELY
CREATE HUNDREDS OF
JOBS, OVER WOULD, YES, LIKELY
CREATE HUNDREDS OF
JOBS, OVER A WOULD, YES, LIKELY
CREATE HUNDREDS OF
JOBS, OVER A FEW WOULD, YES, LIKELY
CREATE HUNDREDS OF
JOBS, OVER A FEW YEARS CREATE HUNDREDS OF
JOBS, OVER A FEW YEARS CREATE HUNDREDS OF
JOBS, OVER A FEW YEARS
GENERATE CREATE HUNDREDS OF
JOBS, OVER A FEW YEARS
GENERATE MILLIONS CREATE HUNDREDS OF
JOBS, OVER A FEW YEARS
GENERATE MILLIONS FOR JOBS, OVER A FEW YEARS
GENERATE MILLIONS FOR JOBS, OVER A FEW YEARS
GENERATE MILLIONS FOR
EDUCATION, JOBS, OVER A FEW YEARS
GENERATE MILLIONS FOR
EDUCATION, AND JOBS, OVER A FEW YEARS
GENERATE MILLIONS FOR
EDUCATION, AND BY JOBS, OVER A FEW YEARS
GENERATE MILLIONS FOR
EDUCATION, AND BY LAW GENERATE MILLIONS FOR
EDUCATION, AND BY LAW GENERATE MILLIONS FOR
EDUCATION, AND BY LAW
HAVE GENERATE MILLIONS FOR
EDUCATION, AND BY LAW
HAVE ALL GENERATE MILLIONS FOR
EDUCATION, AND BY LAW
HAVE ALL FINANCES EDUCATION, AND BY LAW
HAVE ALL FINANCES EDUCATION, AND BY LAW
HAVE ALL FINANCES
AUDITED EDUCATION, AND BY LAW
HAVE ALL FINANCES
AUDITED AND HAVE ALL FINANCES
AUDITED AND HAVE ALL FINANCES
AUDITED AND
MONITORED HAVE ALL FINANCES
AUDITED AND
MONITORED BY HAVE ALL FINANCES
AUDITED AND
MONITORED BY THE HAVE ALL FINANCES
AUDITED AND
MONITORED BY THE STATE. AUDITED AND
MONITORED BY THE STATE. AUDITED AND
MONITORED BY THE STATE.
“….” MONITORED BY THE STATE.
“….” MONITORED BY THE STATE.
“….”
OUT: MONITORED BY THE STATE.
“….”
OUT: CHECK MONITORED BY THE STATE.
“….”
OUT: CHECK OUT MONITORED BY THE STATE.
“….”
OUT: CHECK OUT OUR “….”
OUT: CHECK OUT OUR “….”
OUT: CHECK OUT OUR
OTHER “….”
OUT: CHECK OUT OUR
OTHER REPORTS “….”
OUT: CHECK OUT OUR
OTHER REPORTS IN “….”
OUT: CHECK OUT OUR
OTHER REPORTS IN THIS OUT: CHECK OUT OUR
OTHER REPORTS IN THIS OUT: CHECK OUT OUR
OTHER REPORTS IN THIS
SERIES OUT: CHECK OUT OUR
OTHER REPORTS IN THIS
SERIES OF OUT: CHECK OUT OUR
OTHER REPORTS IN THIS
SERIES OF AD-WATCHES OTHER REPORTS IN THIS
SERIES OF AD-WATCHES OTHER REPORTS IN THIS
SERIES OF AD-WATCHES
ON OTHER REPORTS IN THIS
SERIES OF AD-WATCHES
ON OUR OTHER REPORTS IN THIS
SERIES OF AD-WATCHES
ON OUR WEBSITE OTHER REPORTS IN THIS
SERIES OF AD-WATCHES
ON OUR WEBSITE — SERIES OF AD-WATCHES
ON OUR WEBSITE — SERIES OF AD-WATCHES
ON OUR WEBSITE —
KTVB.COM ON OUR WEBSITE —
KTVB.COM

Only registered users can comment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *