VERIFY: Where would Idaho historical horse racing money go?
Articles Blog

VERIFY: Where would Idaho historical horse racing money go?

August 25, 2019


IN IN THE IN THE LATEST IN THE LATEST
INSTALLMENT IN THE LATEST
INSTALLMENT IN IN THE LATEST
INSTALLMENT IN OUR IN THE LATEST
INSTALLMENT IN OUR
AD-WATCH IN THE LATEST
INSTALLMENT IN OUR
AD-WATCH SERIES IN THE LATEST
INSTALLMENT IN OUR
AD-WATCH SERIES — INSTALLMENT IN OUR
AD-WATCH SERIES — INSTALLMENT IN OUR
AD-WATCH SERIES —
IDAHO INSTALLMENT IN OUR
AD-WATCH SERIES —
IDAHO UNITED INSTALLMENT IN OUR
AD-WATCH SERIES —
IDAHO UNITED AGAINST AD-WATCH SERIES —
IDAHO UNITED AGAINST AD-WATCH SERIES —
IDAHO UNITED AGAINST
PROP AD-WATCH SERIES —
IDAHO UNITED AGAINST
PROP ONE AD-WATCH SERIES —
IDAHO UNITED AGAINST
PROP ONE IS AD-WATCH SERIES —
IDAHO UNITED AGAINST
PROP ONE IS NOW IDAHO UNITED AGAINST
PROP ONE IS NOW IDAHO UNITED AGAINST
PROP ONE IS NOW
RUNNING IDAHO UNITED AGAINST
PROP ONE IS NOW
RUNNING A IDAHO UNITED AGAINST
PROP ONE IS NOW
RUNNING A NEW IDAHO UNITED AGAINST
PROP ONE IS NOW
RUNNING A NEW AD IDAHO UNITED AGAINST
PROP ONE IS NOW
RUNNING A NEW AD THAT PROP ONE IS NOW
RUNNING A NEW AD THAT PROP ONE IS NOW
RUNNING A NEW AD THAT
TAKES PROP ONE IS NOW
RUNNING A NEW AD THAT
TAKES AIM PROP ONE IS NOW
RUNNING A NEW AD THAT
TAKES AIM AT PROP ONE IS NOW
RUNNING A NEW AD THAT
TAKES AIM AT SOME PROP ONE IS NOW
RUNNING A NEW AD THAT
TAKES AIM AT SOME OF RUNNING A NEW AD THAT
TAKES AIM AT SOME OF RUNNING A NEW AD THAT
TAKES AIM AT SOME OF
THE RUNNING A NEW AD THAT
TAKES AIM AT SOME OF
THE SPECIFICS RUNNING A NEW AD THAT
TAKES AIM AT SOME OF
THE SPECIFICS LINED RUNNING A NEW AD THAT
TAKES AIM AT SOME OF
THE SPECIFICS LINED OUT TAKES AIM AT SOME OF
THE SPECIFICS LINED OUT TAKES AIM AT SOME OF
THE SPECIFICS LINED OUT
IN TAKES AIM AT SOME OF
THE SPECIFICS LINED OUT
IN PROP TAKES AIM AT SOME OF
THE SPECIFICS LINED OUT
IN PROP ONE, TAKES AIM AT SOME OF
THE SPECIFICS LINED OUT
IN PROP ONE, LIKE TAKES AIM AT SOME OF
THE SPECIFICS LINED OUT
IN PROP ONE, LIKE WHERE THE SPECIFICS LINED OUT
IN PROP ONE, LIKE WHERE THE SPECIFICS LINED OUT
IN PROP ONE, LIKE WHERE
DOES THE SPECIFICS LINED OUT
IN PROP ONE, LIKE WHERE
DOES IDAHO THE SPECIFICS LINED OUT
IN PROP ONE, LIKE WHERE
DOES IDAHO HISTORICAL IN PROP ONE, LIKE WHERE
DOES IDAHO HISTORICAL IN PROP ONE, LIKE WHERE
DOES IDAHO HISTORICAL
HORSE IN PROP ONE, LIKE WHERE
DOES IDAHO HISTORICAL
HORSE RACING IN PROP ONE, LIKE WHERE
DOES IDAHO HISTORICAL
HORSE RACING MONEY DOES IDAHO HISTORICAL
HORSE RACING MONEY DOES IDAHO HISTORICAL
HORSE RACING MONEY
GO? HORSE RACING MONEY
GO? HORSE RACING MONEY
GO?
OUR HORSE RACING MONEY
GO?
OUR JOE HORSE RACING MONEY
GO?
OUR JOE PARRIS HORSE RACING MONEY
GO?
OUR JOE PARRIS GOES GO?
OUR JOE PARRIS GOES GO?
OUR JOE PARRIS GOES
CLAIM GO?
OUR JOE PARRIS GOES
CLAIM BY GO?
OUR JOE PARRIS GOES
CLAIM BY CLAIM GO?
OUR JOE PARRIS GOES
CLAIM BY CLAIM AND OUR JOE PARRIS GOES
CLAIM BY CLAIM AND OUR JOE PARRIS GOES
CLAIM BY CLAIM AND
VERIFIES OUR JOE PARRIS GOES
CLAIM BY CLAIM AND
VERIFIES WHAT’S OUR JOE PARRIS GOES
CLAIM BY CLAIM AND
VERIFIES WHAT’S TRUE. CLAIM BY CLAIM AND
VERIFIES WHAT’S TRUE. CLAIM BY CLAIM AND
VERIFIES WHAT’S TRUE.
JOE: CLAIM BY CLAIM AND
VERIFIES WHAT’S TRUE.
JOE: THE CLAIM BY CLAIM AND
VERIFIES WHAT’S TRUE.
JOE: THE LATEST CLAIM BY CLAIM AND
VERIFIES WHAT’S TRUE.
JOE: THE LATEST AD CLAIM BY CLAIM AND
VERIFIES WHAT’S TRUE.
JOE: THE LATEST AD FROM VERIFIES WHAT’S TRUE.
JOE: THE LATEST AD FROM VERIFIES WHAT’S TRUE.
JOE: THE LATEST AD FROM
IDAHO VERIFIES WHAT’S TRUE.
JOE: THE LATEST AD FROM
IDAHO UNITED VERIFIES WHAT’S TRUE.
JOE: THE LATEST AD FROM
IDAHO UNITED AGAINST JOE: THE LATEST AD FROM
IDAHO UNITED AGAINST JOE: THE LATEST AD FROM
IDAHO UNITED AGAINST
PROP JOE: THE LATEST AD FROM
IDAHO UNITED AGAINST
PROP 1 JOE: THE LATEST AD FROM
IDAHO UNITED AGAINST
PROP 1 TAKES JOE: THE LATEST AD FROM
IDAHO UNITED AGAINST
PROP 1 TAKES AIM JOE: THE LATEST AD FROM
IDAHO UNITED AGAINST
PROP 1 TAKES AIM AT IDAHO UNITED AGAINST
PROP 1 TAKES AIM AT IDAHO UNITED AGAINST
PROP 1 TAKES AIM AT
HOW IDAHO UNITED AGAINST
PROP 1 TAKES AIM AT
HOW FUNDS IDAHO UNITED AGAINST
PROP 1 TAKES AIM AT
HOW FUNDS FROM PROP 1 TAKES AIM AT
HOW FUNDS FROM PROP 1 TAKES AIM AT
HOW FUNDS FROM
HISTORICAL PROP 1 TAKES AIM AT
HOW FUNDS FROM
HISTORICAL HORSE HOW FUNDS FROM
HISTORICAL HORSE HISTORICAL HORSE RACING RACING MACHINES RACING MACHINES
WOULD RACING MACHINES
WOULD BE RACING MACHINES
WOULD BE DISTRIBUTED RACING MACHINES
WOULD BE DISTRIBUTED
AND RACING MACHINES
WOULD BE DISTRIBUTED
AND ALSO RACING MACHINES
WOULD BE DISTRIBUTED
AND ALSO TAKES RACING MACHINES
WOULD BE DISTRIBUTED
AND ALSO TAKES A RACING MACHINES
WOULD BE DISTRIBUTED
AND ALSO TAKES A LOOK WOULD BE DISTRIBUTED
AND ALSO TAKES A LOOK WOULD BE DISTRIBUTED
AND ALSO TAKES A LOOK
AT WOULD BE DISTRIBUTED
AND ALSO TAKES A LOOK
AT WHAT WOULD BE DISTRIBUTED
AND ALSO TAKES A LOOK
AT WHAT THEY WOULD BE DISTRIBUTED
AND ALSO TAKES A LOOK
AT WHAT THEY CALL AND ALSO TAKES A LOOK
AT WHAT THEY CALL AND ALSO TAKES A LOOK
AT WHAT THEY CALL
FINANCIAL AND ALSO TAKES A LOOK
AT WHAT THEY CALL
FINANCIAL MISTAKES AT WHAT THEY CALL
FINANCIAL MISTAKES AT WHAT THEY CALL
FINANCIAL MISTAKES
WHEN AT WHAT THEY CALL
FINANCIAL MISTAKES
WHEN HHR AT WHAT THEY CALL
FINANCIAL MISTAKES
WHEN HHR MACHINES FINANCIAL MISTAKES
WHEN HHR MACHINES FINANCIAL MISTAKES
WHEN HHR MACHINES
WERE FINANCIAL MISTAKES
WHEN HHR MACHINES
WERE LEGAL FINANCIAL MISTAKES
WHEN HHR MACHINES
WERE LEGAL IN FINANCIAL MISTAKES
WHEN HHR MACHINES
WERE LEGAL IN 2014. WHEN HHR MACHINES
WERE LEGAL IN 2014. WHEN HHR MACHINES
WERE LEGAL IN 2014.
“PROMOTERS WHEN HHR MACHINES
WERE LEGAL IN 2014.
“PROMOTERS OF WHEN HHR MACHINES
WERE LEGAL IN 2014.
“PROMOTERS OF PROP WHEN HHR MACHINES
WERE LEGAL IN 2014.
“PROMOTERS OF PROP 1 WERE LEGAL IN 2014.
“PROMOTERS OF PROP 1 WERE LEGAL IN 2014.
“PROMOTERS OF PROP 1
AREN’T WERE LEGAL IN 2014.
“PROMOTERS OF PROP 1
AREN’T TELLING WERE LEGAL IN 2014.
“PROMOTERS OF PROP 1
AREN’T TELLING YOU WERE LEGAL IN 2014.
“PROMOTERS OF PROP 1
AREN’T TELLING YOU ALL “PROMOTERS OF PROP 1
AREN’T TELLING YOU ALL “PROMOTERS OF PROP 1
AREN’T TELLING YOU ALL
THE “PROMOTERS OF PROP 1
AREN’T TELLING YOU ALL
THE FACTS, “PROMOTERS OF PROP 1
AREN’T TELLING YOU ALL
THE FACTS, READ “PROMOTERS OF PROP 1
AREN’T TELLING YOU ALL
THE FACTS, READ THE “PROMOTERS OF PROP 1
AREN’T TELLING YOU ALL
THE FACTS, READ THE FINE AREN’T TELLING YOU ALL
THE FACTS, READ THE FINE AREN’T TELLING YOU ALL
THE FACTS, READ THE FINE
PRINT. AREN’T TELLING YOU ALL
THE FACTS, READ THE FINE
PRINT. PROP AREN’T TELLING YOU ALL
THE FACTS, READ THE FINE
PRINT. PROP ONE THE FACTS, READ THE FINE
PRINT. PROP ONE THE FACTS, READ THE FINE
PRINT. PROP ONE
LANGUAGE THE FACTS, READ THE FINE
PRINT. PROP ONE
LANGUAGE SAYS PRINT. PROP ONE
LANGUAGE SAYS LANGUAGE SAYS PROMOTERS PROMOTERS TAKE PROMOTERS TAKE
GUARANTEED PROMOTERS TAKE
GUARANTEED PROFIT, PROMOTERS TAKE
GUARANTEED PROFIT, 18 PROMOTERS TAKE
GUARANTEED PROFIT, 18
TIMES PROMOTERS TAKE
GUARANTEED PROFIT, 18
TIMES MORE PROMOTERS TAKE
GUARANTEED PROFIT, 18
TIMES MORE THAN PROMOTERS TAKE
GUARANTEED PROFIT, 18
TIMES MORE THAN THEY GUARANTEED PROFIT, 18
TIMES MORE THAN THEY GUARANTEED PROFIT, 18
TIMES MORE THAN THEY
PROMISE GUARANTEED PROFIT, 18
TIMES MORE THAN THEY
PROMISE SCHOOLS…..THEY TIMES MORE THAN THEY
PROMISE SCHOOLS…..THEY TIMES MORE THAN THEY
PROMISE SCHOOLS…..THEY
GET TIMES MORE THAN THEY
PROMISE SCHOOLS…..THEY
GET DOLLARS, TIMES MORE THAN THEY
PROMISE SCHOOLS…..THEY
GET DOLLARS, SCHOOLS PROMISE SCHOOLS…..THEY
GET DOLLARS, SCHOOLS PROMISE SCHOOLS…..THEY
GET DOLLARS, SCHOOLS
GET PROMISE SCHOOLS…..THEY
GET DOLLARS, SCHOOLS
GET PENNIES.” GET DOLLARS, SCHOOLS
GET PENNIES.” GET DOLLARS, SCHOOLS
GET PENNIES.”
WE GET DOLLARS, SCHOOLS
GET PENNIES.”
WE CAN GET DOLLARS, SCHOOLS
GET PENNIES.”
WE CAN VERIFY, GET DOLLARS, SCHOOLS
GET PENNIES.”
WE CAN VERIFY, THAT GET DOLLARS, SCHOOLS
GET PENNIES.”
WE CAN VERIFY, THAT IS GET PENNIES.”
WE CAN VERIFY, THAT IS GET PENNIES.”
WE CAN VERIFY, THAT IS
TRUE. WE CAN VERIFY, THAT IS
TRUE. WE CAN VERIFY, THAT IS
TRUE.
IF WE CAN VERIFY, THAT IS
TRUE.
IF PASSED, WE CAN VERIFY, THAT IS
TRUE.
IF PASSED, PROP WE CAN VERIFY, THAT IS
TRUE.
IF PASSED, PROP ONE WE CAN VERIFY, THAT IS
TRUE.
IF PASSED, PROP ONE HAS TRUE.
IF PASSED, PROP ONE HAS TRUE.
IF PASSED, PROP ONE HAS
A TRUE.
IF PASSED, PROP ONE HAS
A VERY TRUE.
IF PASSED, PROP ONE HAS
A VERY SPECIFIC TRUE.
IF PASSED, PROP ONE HAS
A VERY SPECIFIC OUTLINE IF PASSED, PROP ONE HAS
A VERY SPECIFIC OUTLINE IF PASSED, PROP ONE HAS
A VERY SPECIFIC OUTLINE
FOR IF PASSED, PROP ONE HAS
A VERY SPECIFIC OUTLINE
FOR WHERE IF PASSED, PROP ONE HAS
A VERY SPECIFIC OUTLINE
FOR WHERE MONEY A VERY SPECIFIC OUTLINE
FOR WHERE MONEY A VERY SPECIFIC OUTLINE
FOR WHERE MONEY
GENERATED A VERY SPECIFIC OUTLINE
FOR WHERE MONEY
GENERATED BY FOR WHERE MONEY
GENERATED BY FOR WHERE MONEY
GENERATED BY
HISTORICAL FOR WHERE MONEY
GENERATED BY
HISTORICAL HORSE GENERATED BY
HISTORICAL HORSE HISTORICAL HORSE RACING RACING MACHINES RACING MACHINES
LEGALLY RACING MACHINES
LEGALLY HAS RACING MACHINES
LEGALLY HAS TO RACING MACHINES
LEGALLY HAS TO GO. RACING MACHINES
LEGALLY HAS TO GO.
AS RACING MACHINES
LEGALLY HAS TO GO.
AS THE RACING MACHINES
LEGALLY HAS TO GO.
AS THE AD RACING MACHINES
LEGALLY HAS TO GO.
AS THE AD SHOWS, RACING MACHINES
LEGALLY HAS TO GO.
AS THE AD SHOWS, ONE LEGALLY HAS TO GO.
AS THE AD SHOWS, ONE LEGALLY HAS TO GO.
AS THE AD SHOWS, ONE
HALF LEGALLY HAS TO GO.
AS THE AD SHOWS, ONE
HALF OF LEGALLY HAS TO GO.
AS THE AD SHOWS, ONE
HALF OF ONE LEGALLY HAS TO GO.
AS THE AD SHOWS, ONE
HALF OF ONE PERCENT LEGALLY HAS TO GO.
AS THE AD SHOWS, ONE
HALF OF ONE PERCENT OF AS THE AD SHOWS, ONE
HALF OF ONE PERCENT OF AS THE AD SHOWS, ONE
HALF OF ONE PERCENT OF
ALL AS THE AD SHOWS, ONE
HALF OF ONE PERCENT OF
ALL DAILY AS THE AD SHOWS, ONE
HALF OF ONE PERCENT OF
ALL DAILY FUNDS AS THE AD SHOWS, ONE
HALF OF ONE PERCENT OF
ALL DAILY FUNDS FROM HALF OF ONE PERCENT OF
ALL DAILY FUNDS FROM HALF OF ONE PERCENT OF
ALL DAILY FUNDS FROM
HHR HALF OF ONE PERCENT OF
ALL DAILY FUNDS FROM
HHR MACHINES HALF OF ONE PERCENT OF
ALL DAILY FUNDS FROM
HHR MACHINES WOULD ALL DAILY FUNDS FROM
HHR MACHINES WOULD ALL DAILY FUNDS FROM
HHR MACHINES WOULD
GO ALL DAILY FUNDS FROM
HHR MACHINES WOULD
GO TO ALL DAILY FUNDS FROM
HHR MACHINES WOULD
GO TO THE ALL DAILY FUNDS FROM
HHR MACHINES WOULD
GO TO THE PUBLIC HHR MACHINES WOULD
GO TO THE PUBLIC HHR MACHINES WOULD
GO TO THE PUBLIC
SCHOOL HHR MACHINES WOULD
GO TO THE PUBLIC
SCHOOL INCOME HHR MACHINES WOULD
GO TO THE PUBLIC
SCHOOL INCOME FUND. GO TO THE PUBLIC
SCHOOL INCOME FUND. GO TO THE PUBLIC
SCHOOL INCOME FUND.
THE GO TO THE PUBLIC
SCHOOL INCOME FUND.
THE MEASURE GO TO THE PUBLIC
SCHOOL INCOME FUND.
THE MEASURE ALLOWS SCHOOL INCOME FUND.
THE MEASURE ALLOWS SCHOOL INCOME FUND.
THE MEASURE ALLOWS
FOR SCHOOL INCOME FUND.
THE MEASURE ALLOWS
FOR THE SCHOOL INCOME FUND.
THE MEASURE ALLOWS
FOR THE OWNER SCHOOL INCOME FUND.
THE MEASURE ALLOWS
FOR THE OWNER OF SCHOOL INCOME FUND.
THE MEASURE ALLOWS
FOR THE OWNER OF EACH THE MEASURE ALLOWS
FOR THE OWNER OF EACH THE MEASURE ALLOWS
FOR THE OWNER OF EACH
VENUE THE MEASURE ALLOWS
FOR THE OWNER OF EACH
VENUE LICENSE, THE MEASURE ALLOWS
FOR THE OWNER OF EACH
VENUE LICENSE, TO THE MEASURE ALLOWS
FOR THE OWNER OF EACH
VENUE LICENSE, TO KEEP FOR THE OWNER OF EACH
VENUE LICENSE, TO KEEP FOR THE OWNER OF EACH
VENUE LICENSE, TO KEEP
9% FOR THE OWNER OF EACH
VENUE LICENSE, TO KEEP
9% OF FOR THE OWNER OF EACH
VENUE LICENSE, TO KEEP
9% OF TOTAL FOR THE OWNER OF EACH
VENUE LICENSE, TO KEEP
9% OF TOTAL DAILY VENUE LICENSE, TO KEEP
9% OF TOTAL DAILY VENUE LICENSE, TO KEEP
9% OF TOTAL DAILY
FUNDS. 9% OF TOTAL DAILY
FUNDS. 9% OF TOTAL DAILY
FUNDS.
SO 9% OF TOTAL DAILY
FUNDS.
SO THE 9% OF TOTAL DAILY
FUNDS.
SO THE MATH 9% OF TOTAL DAILY
FUNDS.
SO THE MATH CHECKS FUNDS.
SO THE MATH CHECKS FUNDS.
SO THE MATH CHECKS
OUT. FUNDS.
SO THE MATH CHECKS
OUT. THE FUNDS.
SO THE MATH CHECKS
OUT. THE 9% FUNDS.
SO THE MATH CHECKS
OUT. THE 9% THAT FUNDS.
SO THE MATH CHECKS
OUT. THE 9% THAT THE SO THE MATH CHECKS
OUT. THE 9% THAT THE SO THE MATH CHECKS
OUT. THE 9% THAT THE
OWNERS SO THE MATH CHECKS
OUT. THE 9% THAT THE
OWNERS ARE SO THE MATH CHECKS
OUT. THE 9% THAT THE
OWNERS ARE ALLOWED OUT. THE 9% THAT THE
OWNERS ARE ALLOWED OUT. THE 9% THAT THE
OWNERS ARE ALLOWED
TO OUT. THE 9% THAT THE
OWNERS ARE ALLOWED
TO KEEP OUT. THE 9% THAT THE
OWNERS ARE ALLOWED
TO KEEP IS OUT. THE 9% THAT THE
OWNERS ARE ALLOWED
TO KEEP IS 18 OUT. THE 9% THAT THE
OWNERS ARE ALLOWED
TO KEEP IS 18 TIMES OUT. THE 9% THAT THE
OWNERS ARE ALLOWED
TO KEEP IS 18 TIMES MORE OWNERS ARE ALLOWED
TO KEEP IS 18 TIMES MORE OWNERS ARE ALLOWED
TO KEEP IS 18 TIMES MORE
THAN OWNERS ARE ALLOWED
TO KEEP IS 18 TIMES MORE
THAN ONE OWNERS ARE ALLOWED
TO KEEP IS 18 TIMES MORE
THAN ONE HALF OWNERS ARE ALLOWED
TO KEEP IS 18 TIMES MORE
THAN ONE HALF OF OWNERS ARE ALLOWED
TO KEEP IS 18 TIMES MORE
THAN ONE HALF OF ONE TO KEEP IS 18 TIMES MORE
THAN ONE HALF OF ONE TO KEEP IS 18 TIMES MORE
THAN ONE HALF OF ONE
PERCENT TO KEEP IS 18 TIMES MORE
THAN ONE HALF OF ONE
PERCENT THAT TO KEEP IS 18 TIMES MORE
THAN ONE HALF OF ONE
PERCENT THAT WOULD TO KEEP IS 18 TIMES MORE
THAN ONE HALF OF ONE
PERCENT THAT WOULD GO THAN ONE HALF OF ONE
PERCENT THAT WOULD GO THAN ONE HALF OF ONE
PERCENT THAT WOULD GO
TO THAN ONE HALF OF ONE
PERCENT THAT WOULD GO
TO SCHOOLS. PERCENT THAT WOULD GO
TO SCHOOLS. PERCENT THAT WOULD GO
TO SCHOOLS.
IF PERCENT THAT WOULD GO
TO SCHOOLS.
IF YOU PERCENT THAT WOULD GO
TO SCHOOLS.
IF YOU WERE PERCENT THAT WOULD GO
TO SCHOOLS.
IF YOU WERE CURIOUS, TO SCHOOLS.
IF YOU WERE CURIOUS, TO SCHOOLS.
IF YOU WERE CURIOUS,
BASED TO SCHOOLS.
IF YOU WERE CURIOUS,
BASED ON TO SCHOOLS.
IF YOU WERE CURIOUS,
BASED ON OFFICIAL TO SCHOOLS.
IF YOU WERE CURIOUS,
BASED ON OFFICIAL 2015 IF YOU WERE CURIOUS,
BASED ON OFFICIAL 2015 IF YOU WERE CURIOUS,
BASED ON OFFICIAL 2015
NUMBERS IF YOU WERE CURIOUS,
BASED ON OFFICIAL 2015
NUMBERS FROM IF YOU WERE CURIOUS,
BASED ON OFFICIAL 2015
NUMBERS FROM THE BASED ON OFFICIAL 2015
NUMBERS FROM THE BASED ON OFFICIAL 2015
NUMBERS FROM THE
IDAHO BASED ON OFFICIAL 2015
NUMBERS FROM THE
IDAHO STATE BASED ON OFFICIAL 2015
NUMBERS FROM THE
IDAHO STATE RACING NUMBERS FROM THE
IDAHO STATE RACING NUMBERS FROM THE
IDAHO STATE RACING
COMMISSION, NUMBERS FROM THE
IDAHO STATE RACING
COMMISSION, BASED NUMBERS FROM THE
IDAHO STATE RACING
COMMISSION, BASED ON IDAHO STATE RACING
COMMISSION, BASED ON IDAHO STATE RACING
COMMISSION, BASED ON
THE IDAHO STATE RACING
COMMISSION, BASED ON
THE ONE IDAHO STATE RACING
COMMISSION, BASED ON
THE ONE HALF IDAHO STATE RACING
COMMISSION, BASED ON
THE ONE HALF OF IDAHO STATE RACING
COMMISSION, BASED ON
THE ONE HALF OF ONE COMMISSION, BASED ON
THE ONE HALF OF ONE COMMISSION, BASED ON
THE ONE HALF OF ONE
PERCENT COMMISSION, BASED ON
THE ONE HALF OF ONE
PERCENT ANNUAL THE ONE HALF OF ONE
PERCENT ANNUAL THE ONE HALF OF ONE
PERCENT ANNUAL
PERCENTAGE, THE ONE HALF OF ONE
PERCENT ANNUAL
PERCENTAGE, PROP THE ONE HALF OF ONE
PERCENT ANNUAL
PERCENTAGE, PROP ONE PERCENT ANNUAL
PERCENTAGE, PROP ONE PERCENT ANNUAL
PERCENTAGE, PROP ONE
WOULD PERCENT ANNUAL
PERCENTAGE, PROP ONE
WOULD GENERATE PERCENT ANNUAL
PERCENTAGE, PROP ONE
WOULD GENERATE A PERCENTAGE, PROP ONE
WOULD GENERATE A PERCENTAGE, PROP ONE
WOULD GENERATE A
LITTLE PERCENTAGE, PROP ONE
WOULD GENERATE A
LITTLE MORE PERCENTAGE, PROP ONE
WOULD GENERATE A
LITTLE MORE ABOUT WOULD GENERATE A
LITTLE MORE ABOUT WOULD GENERATE A
LITTLE MORE ABOUT
$600,000 WOULD GENERATE A
LITTLE MORE ABOUT
$600,000 A WOULD GENERATE A
LITTLE MORE ABOUT
$600,000 A YEAR WOULD GENERATE A
LITTLE MORE ABOUT
$600,000 A YEAR FOR LITTLE MORE ABOUT
$600,000 A YEAR FOR LITTLE MORE ABOUT
$600,000 A YEAR FOR
SCHOOLS. $600,000 A YEAR FOR
SCHOOLS. $600,000 A YEAR FOR
SCHOOLS.
WHAT $600,000 A YEAR FOR
SCHOOLS.
WHAT ABOUT $600,000 A YEAR FOR
SCHOOLS.
WHAT ABOUT THE $600,000 A YEAR FOR
SCHOOLS.
WHAT ABOUT THE REST $600,000 A YEAR FOR
SCHOOLS.
WHAT ABOUT THE REST OF SCHOOLS.
WHAT ABOUT THE REST OF SCHOOLS.
WHAT ABOUT THE REST OF
THE SCHOOLS.
WHAT ABOUT THE REST OF
THE MONEY? WHAT ABOUT THE REST OF
THE MONEY? WHAT ABOUT THE REST OF
THE MONEY?
PER WHAT ABOUT THE REST OF
THE MONEY?
PER THE WHAT ABOUT THE REST OF
THE MONEY?
PER THE PROPOSITION, THE MONEY?
PER THE PROPOSITION, THE MONEY?
PER THE PROPOSITION,
90% THE MONEY?
PER THE PROPOSITION,
90% OF THE MONEY?
PER THE PROPOSITION,
90% OF GROSS THE MONEY?
PER THE PROPOSITION,
90% OF GROSS DAILY PER THE PROPOSITION,
90% OF GROSS DAILY PER THE PROPOSITION,
90% OF GROSS DAILY
RECEIPTS PER THE PROPOSITION,
90% OF GROSS DAILY
RECEIPTS WOULD PER THE PROPOSITION,
90% OF GROSS DAILY
RECEIPTS WOULD GO 90% OF GROSS DAILY
RECEIPTS WOULD GO 90% OF GROSS DAILY
RECEIPTS WOULD GO
TOWARDS 90% OF GROSS DAILY
RECEIPTS WOULD GO
TOWARDS PAYMENTS 90% OF GROSS DAILY
RECEIPTS WOULD GO
TOWARDS PAYMENTS TO RECEIPTS WOULD GO
TOWARDS PAYMENTS TO RECEIPTS WOULD GO
TOWARDS PAYMENTS TO
WINNING RECEIPTS WOULD GO
TOWARDS PAYMENTS TO
WINNING BETTORS. TOWARDS PAYMENTS TO
WINNING BETTORS. TOWARDS PAYMENTS TO
WINNING BETTORS.
THE TOWARDS PAYMENTS TO
WINNING BETTORS.
THE LESS TOWARDS PAYMENTS TO
WINNING BETTORS.
THE LESS THAN TOWARDS PAYMENTS TO
WINNING BETTORS.
THE LESS THAN 1% WINNING BETTORS.
THE LESS THAN 1% WINNING BETTORS.
THE LESS THAN 1%
REMAINING WINNING BETTORS.
THE LESS THAN 1%
REMAINING WOULD WINNING BETTORS.
THE LESS THAN 1%
REMAINING WOULD BE THE LESS THAN 1%
REMAINING WOULD BE THE LESS THAN 1%
REMAINING WOULD BE
DISTRIBUTED THE LESS THAN 1%
REMAINING WOULD BE
DISTRIBUTED TO THE LESS THAN 1%
REMAINING WOULD BE
DISTRIBUTED TO 4 THE LESS THAN 1%
REMAINING WOULD BE
DISTRIBUTED TO 4 OTHER REMAINING WOULD BE
DISTRIBUTED TO 4 OTHER REMAINING WOULD BE
DISTRIBUTED TO 4 OTHER
FUNDS. DISTRIBUTED TO 4 OTHER
FUNDS. DISTRIBUTED TO 4 OTHER
FUNDS.
“IDAHO DISTRIBUTED TO 4 OTHER
FUNDS.
“IDAHO TRIED DISTRIBUTED TO 4 OTHER
FUNDS.
“IDAHO TRIED THIS FUNDS.
“IDAHO TRIED THIS FUNDS.
“IDAHO TRIED THIS
BEFORE, FUNDS.
“IDAHO TRIED THIS
BEFORE, THE FUNDS.
“IDAHO TRIED THIS
BEFORE, THE IDAHO FUNDS.
“IDAHO TRIED THIS
BEFORE, THE IDAHO STATE “IDAHO TRIED THIS
BEFORE, THE IDAHO STATE “IDAHO TRIED THIS
BEFORE, THE IDAHO STATE
AUDITOR “IDAHO TRIED THIS
BEFORE, THE IDAHO STATE
AUDITOR FOUND “IDAHO TRIED THIS
BEFORE, THE IDAHO STATE
AUDITOR FOUND LAST BEFORE, THE IDAHO STATE
AUDITOR FOUND LAST BEFORE, THE IDAHO STATE
AUDITOR FOUND LAST
TIME BEFORE, THE IDAHO STATE
AUDITOR FOUND LAST
TIME MACHINES BEFORE, THE IDAHO STATE
AUDITOR FOUND LAST
TIME MACHINES WERE AUDITOR FOUND LAST
TIME MACHINES WERE AUDITOR FOUND LAST
TIME MACHINES WERE
LEGAL, AUDITOR FOUND LAST
TIME MACHINES WERE
LEGAL, MONEY AUDITOR FOUND LAST
TIME MACHINES WERE
LEGAL, MONEY PROMISED TIME MACHINES WERE
LEGAL, MONEY PROMISED TIME MACHINES WERE
LEGAL, MONEY PROMISED
TO TIME MACHINES WERE
LEGAL, MONEY PROMISED
TO SCHOOLS TIME MACHINES WERE
LEGAL, MONEY PROMISED
TO SCHOOLS WAS TIME MACHINES WERE
LEGAL, MONEY PROMISED
TO SCHOOLS WAS TAKEN LEGAL, MONEY PROMISED
TO SCHOOLS WAS TAKEN LEGAL, MONEY PROMISED
TO SCHOOLS WAS TAKEN
AWAY LEGAL, MONEY PROMISED
TO SCHOOLS WAS TAKEN
AWAY AND LEGAL, MONEY PROMISED
TO SCHOOLS WAS TAKEN
AWAY AND MISSPENT TO SCHOOLS WAS TAKEN
AWAY AND MISSPENT TO SCHOOLS WAS TAKEN
AWAY AND MISSPENT
ILLEGALLY…..” AWAY AND MISSPENT
ILLEGALLY…..” AWAY AND MISSPENT
ILLEGALLY…..”
WE AWAY AND MISSPENT
ILLEGALLY…..”
WE CAN AWAY AND MISSPENT
ILLEGALLY…..”
WE CAN VERIFY AWAY AND MISSPENT
ILLEGALLY…..”
WE CAN VERIFY THAT AWAY AND MISSPENT
ILLEGALLY…..”
WE CAN VERIFY THAT IN ILLEGALLY…..”
WE CAN VERIFY THAT IN ILLEGALLY…..”
WE CAN VERIFY THAT IN
2015, ILLEGALLY…..”
WE CAN VERIFY THAT IN
2015, MONEY ILLEGALLY…..”
WE CAN VERIFY THAT IN
2015, MONEY THAT WE CAN VERIFY THAT IN
2015, MONEY THAT WE CAN VERIFY THAT IN
2015, MONEY THAT
SHOULD WE CAN VERIFY THAT IN
2015, MONEY THAT
SHOULD HAVE WE CAN VERIFY THAT IN
2015, MONEY THAT
SHOULD HAVE GONE WE CAN VERIFY THAT IN
2015, MONEY THAT
SHOULD HAVE GONE TO 2015, MONEY THAT
SHOULD HAVE GONE TO 2015, MONEY THAT
SHOULD HAVE GONE TO
PUBLIC 2015, MONEY THAT
SHOULD HAVE GONE TO
PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015, MONEY THAT
SHOULD HAVE GONE TO
PUBLIC SCHOOLS DID 2015, MONEY THAT
SHOULD HAVE GONE TO
PUBLIC SCHOOLS DID NOT. SHOULD HAVE GONE TO
PUBLIC SCHOOLS DID NOT. SHOULD HAVE GONE TO
PUBLIC SCHOOLS DID NOT.
ACCORDING SHOULD HAVE GONE TO
PUBLIC SCHOOLS DID NOT.
ACCORDING TO SHOULD HAVE GONE TO
PUBLIC SCHOOLS DID NOT.
ACCORDING TO A SHOULD HAVE GONE TO
PUBLIC SCHOOLS DID NOT.
ACCORDING TO A STATE PUBLIC SCHOOLS DID NOT.
ACCORDING TO A STATE PUBLIC SCHOOLS DID NOT.
ACCORDING TO A STATE
AUDIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS DID NOT.
ACCORDING TO A STATE
AUDIT OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS DID NOT.
ACCORDING TO A STATE
AUDIT OF THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS DID NOT.
ACCORDING TO A STATE
AUDIT OF THE IDAHO ACCORDING TO A STATE
AUDIT OF THE IDAHO ACCORDING TO A STATE
AUDIT OF THE IDAHO
STATE ACCORDING TO A STATE
AUDIT OF THE IDAHO
STATE RACING AUDIT OF THE IDAHO
STATE RACING AUDIT OF THE IDAHO
STATE RACING
COMMISSION, AUDIT OF THE IDAHO
STATE RACING
COMMISSION, IN AUDIT OF THE IDAHO
STATE RACING
COMMISSION, IN 2015 AUDIT OF THE IDAHO
STATE RACING
COMMISSION, IN 2015 A STATE RACING
COMMISSION, IN 2015 A STATE RACING
COMMISSION, IN 2015 A
LITTLE STATE RACING
COMMISSION, IN 2015 A
LITTLE MORE STATE RACING
COMMISSION, IN 2015 A
LITTLE MORE THAN COMMISSION, IN 2015 A
LITTLE MORE THAN COMMISSION, IN 2015 A
LITTLE MORE THAN
$72,000 COMMISSION, IN 2015 A
LITTLE MORE THAN
$72,000 THAT COMMISSION, IN 2015 A
LITTLE MORE THAN
$72,000 THAT SHOULD LITTLE MORE THAN
$72,000 THAT SHOULD LITTLE MORE THAN
$72,000 THAT SHOULD
HAVE LITTLE MORE THAN
$72,000 THAT SHOULD
HAVE GONE LITTLE MORE THAN
$72,000 THAT SHOULD
HAVE GONE TO LITTLE MORE THAN
$72,000 THAT SHOULD
HAVE GONE TO THE $72,000 THAT SHOULD
HAVE GONE TO THE $72,000 THAT SHOULD
HAVE GONE TO THE
PUBLIC $72,000 THAT SHOULD
HAVE GONE TO THE
PUBLIC SCHOOL $72,000 THAT SHOULD
HAVE GONE TO THE
PUBLIC SCHOOL INCOME HAVE GONE TO THE
PUBLIC SCHOOL INCOME HAVE GONE TO THE
PUBLIC SCHOOL INCOME
FUND HAVE GONE TO THE
PUBLIC SCHOOL INCOME
FUND WAS HAVE GONE TO THE
PUBLIC SCHOOL INCOME
FUND WAS INSTEAD PUBLIC SCHOOL INCOME
FUND WAS INSTEAD PUBLIC SCHOOL INCOME
FUND WAS INSTEAD
INCLUDED PUBLIC SCHOOL INCOME
FUND WAS INSTEAD
INCLUDED IN PUBLIC SCHOOL INCOME
FUND WAS INSTEAD
INCLUDED IN A FUND WAS INSTEAD
INCLUDED IN A FUND WAS INSTEAD
INCLUDED IN A
DISTRIBUTION FUND WAS INSTEAD
INCLUDED IN A
DISTRIBUTION TO FUND WAS INSTEAD
INCLUDED IN A
DISTRIBUTION TO TWO INCLUDED IN A
DISTRIBUTION TO TWO INCLUDED IN A
DISTRIBUTION TO TWO
HORSE INCLUDED IN A
DISTRIBUTION TO TWO
HORSE BREEDER DISTRIBUTION TO TWO
HORSE BREEDER DISTRIBUTION TO TWO
HORSE BREEDER
ASSOCIATIONS. HORSE BREEDER
ASSOCIATIONS. HORSE BREEDER
ASSOCIATIONS.
OTHER HORSE BREEDER
ASSOCIATIONS.
OTHER MONEY HORSE BREEDER
ASSOCIATIONS.
OTHER MONEY FROM HORSE BREEDER
ASSOCIATIONS.
OTHER MONEY FROM HHR ASSOCIATIONS.
OTHER MONEY FROM HHR ASSOCIATIONS.
OTHER MONEY FROM HHR
MACHINES ASSOCIATIONS.
OTHER MONEY FROM HHR
MACHINES DID ASSOCIATIONS.
OTHER MONEY FROM HHR
MACHINES DID GO ASSOCIATIONS.
OTHER MONEY FROM HHR
MACHINES DID GO TO OTHER MONEY FROM HHR
MACHINES DID GO TO OTHER MONEY FROM HHR
MACHINES DID GO TO
PUBLIC OTHER MONEY FROM HHR
MACHINES DID GO TO
PUBLIC SCHOOLS, OTHER MONEY FROM HHR
MACHINES DID GO TO
PUBLIC SCHOOLS, BUT MACHINES DID GO TO
PUBLIC SCHOOLS, BUT MACHINES DID GO TO
PUBLIC SCHOOLS, BUT
AGAIN MACHINES DID GO TO
PUBLIC SCHOOLS, BUT
AGAIN THAT MACHINES DID GO TO
PUBLIC SCHOOLS, BUT
AGAIN THAT $72,000 MACHINES DID GO TO
PUBLIC SCHOOLS, BUT
AGAIN THAT $72,000 DID PUBLIC SCHOOLS, BUT
AGAIN THAT $72,000 DID PUBLIC SCHOOLS, BUT
AGAIN THAT $72,000 DID
NOT. AGAIN THAT $72,000 DID
NOT. AGAIN THAT $72,000 DID
NOT.
IN AGAIN THAT $72,000 DID
NOT.
IN ADDITION AGAIN THAT $72,000 DID
NOT.
IN ADDITION THE AGAIN THAT $72,000 DID
NOT.
IN ADDITION THE AUDIT NOT.
IN ADDITION THE AUDIT NOT.
IN ADDITION THE AUDIT
FOUND NOT.
IN ADDITION THE AUDIT
FOUND THE NOT.
IN ADDITION THE AUDIT
FOUND THE COMMISSION IN ADDITION THE AUDIT
FOUND THE COMMISSION IN ADDITION THE AUDIT
FOUND THE COMMISSION
DIDN’T IN ADDITION THE AUDIT
FOUND THE COMMISSION
DIDN’T EVEN IN ADDITION THE AUDIT
FOUND THE COMMISSION
DIDN’T EVEN HAVE IN ADDITION THE AUDIT
FOUND THE COMMISSION
DIDN’T EVEN HAVE THE FOUND THE COMMISSION
DIDN’T EVEN HAVE THE FOUND THE COMMISSION
DIDN’T EVEN HAVE THE
AUTHORITY FOUND THE COMMISSION
DIDN’T EVEN HAVE THE
AUTHORITY TO FOUND THE COMMISSION
DIDN’T EVEN HAVE THE
AUTHORITY TO DISTRIBUTE DIDN’T EVEN HAVE THE
AUTHORITY TO DISTRIBUTE DIDN’T EVEN HAVE THE
AUTHORITY TO DISTRIBUTE
THE DIDN’T EVEN HAVE THE
AUTHORITY TO DISTRIBUTE
THE MONEY DIDN’T EVEN HAVE THE
AUTHORITY TO DISTRIBUTE
THE MONEY BECAUSE DIDN’T EVEN HAVE THE
AUTHORITY TO DISTRIBUTE
THE MONEY BECAUSE THE AUTHORITY TO DISTRIBUTE
THE MONEY BECAUSE THE AUTHORITY TO DISTRIBUTE
THE MONEY BECAUSE THE
LAW AUTHORITY TO DISTRIBUTE
THE MONEY BECAUSE THE
LAW LEGALIZING AUTHORITY TO DISTRIBUTE
THE MONEY BECAUSE THE
LAW LEGALIZING H-H-R THE MONEY BECAUSE THE
LAW LEGALIZING H-H-R THE MONEY BECAUSE THE
LAW LEGALIZING H-H-R
MACHINES THE MONEY BECAUSE THE
LAW LEGALIZING H-H-R
MACHINES HAD THE MONEY BECAUSE THE
LAW LEGALIZING H-H-R
MACHINES HAD BEEN LAW LEGALIZING H-H-R
MACHINES HAD BEEN LAW LEGALIZING H-H-R
MACHINES HAD BEEN
REPEALED LAW LEGALIZING H-H-R
MACHINES HAD BEEN
REPEALED EARLIER LAW LEGALIZING H-H-R
MACHINES HAD BEEN
REPEALED EARLIER IN MACHINES HAD BEEN
REPEALED EARLIER IN MACHINES HAD BEEN
REPEALED EARLIER IN
2015. MACHINES HAD BEEN
REPEALED EARLIER IN
2015. WITH MACHINES HAD BEEN
REPEALED EARLIER IN
2015. WITH THAT MACHINES HAD BEEN
REPEALED EARLIER IN
2015. WITH THAT THE REPEALED EARLIER IN
2015. WITH THAT THE REPEALED EARLIER IN
2015. WITH THAT THE
COMMISSION REPEALED EARLIER IN
2015. WITH THAT THE
COMMISSION WAS 2015. WITH THAT THE
COMMISSION WAS 2015. WITH THAT THE
COMMISSION WAS
STRIPPED 2015. WITH THAT THE
COMMISSION WAS
STRIPPED FROM COMMISSION WAS
STRIPPED FROM COMMISSION WAS
STRIPPED FROM
DISTRIBUTING COMMISSION WAS
STRIPPED FROM
DISTRIBUTING ANY COMMISSION WAS
STRIPPED FROM
DISTRIBUTING ANY FUNDS. STRIPPED FROM
DISTRIBUTING ANY FUNDS.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *